Caroline Oliver

 

promoting purpose, integrity and efficiency in governance

 

 

 

A Distinct Form of Leadership

 

Governance is distinct from management because it is:

 

  • the bridge between the organization and the external world within which it operates and to which it is accountable
  • the initial authority within an organization
  • group leadership rather than individual leadership

 

Policy Governance - A Definition

 

Policy Governance is an operating system that efficiently focuses boards on their unique contribution to

organizations’ results.

 

Boards are ultimately accountable for everything their organization does and does not do. Whereas

organizations may operate 24/7, the board has a limited amount of time available to exercise their oversight.

Grounded in universal governance principles and bespoke policy design, Policy Governance makes it possible for boards to control through creating and monitoring policy. The board is able to organize all its thoughts, activities, structures and relationships in one policy document or manual (the only other necessary governing documents being Letters Patent, by-laws and minutes of board meetings).

 

The Policy Design

Governing policies are categorized under four headings:

 

Ends: the answers to the questions: what benefit is this organization to produce, for which people and at

what cost?

 

Executive Limitations: the limits of ethics and prudence to which the CEO must adhere (always

expressed in the negative e.g. “the CEO shall not fail to” or “the CEO may not”).

 

Governance Process: the board’s definition of, and rules for, its own job.

 

Board-Management Relationship: the board’s delegation and accountability linkage through the CEO.

 

In each policy category, the board starts with a statement that expresses its broadest values, and then moves

down level by level to express itself more specifically. At whatever level the board feels it has said enough, the

CEO is free to act on ‘any reasonable interpretation of the board’s Ends and Executive Limitations policies and

the Chair is free to act on ‘any reasonable interpretation’ of the board’s Governance Process and Board-

Management Relationship policies.

 

This form of policy design ensures a) that there is no area of operation about which the board has been silent

and b) that the board’s role and the CEO’s and Chair’s roles are clearly delineated.

 

Policy Monitoring

 

The Policy Governance board can only be truly accountable if it is monitoring the implementation of its policies.

 

This can be done by whatever method (internal report, direct board inspection or external audit) and at

whatever frequency (annually, quarterly or monthly) the board dictates in its policy.

 

The policies form the only criteria for the monitoring process. The results of the monitoring process also

provide the only basis for CEO evaluation (in relation to fulfillment of the board’s Ends policies and compliance

with the board’s Executive Limitations policies) and the board’s own evaluation of itself (in relation to their own

compliance with the board’s Governance Process and Board-Management Relationship policies).

 

Living the Policy

 

The board’s policy is kept alive and current because the board resolves issues and makes decisions by looking

at its policies. If they find that they have not already said enough, or that they have not said what they now want

to say - they change the policy and therefore change their expectations of the CEO or themselves for the future.

 

Back to Homepage

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact information:

 

Caroline Oliver,

41 Highgate, Beverley,

East Riding of Yorkshire,

HU17 0DN

 

Mobile:  07766 273837

 

email: coliver@carolineoliver.com

 

Member of The Governance Corporation Network